Archive for the ‘print media’ Category

Are your campaigns becoming one dimensional?

With the recent announcement from Ziff Davis Enterprise that they will be closing their remaining print titles (including eWeek and CIO Insight), the IT tech industry will again lose vital print life-blood in its media support system.

On the face of it, it really should not matter. IT professionals exist across hundreds of websites and can be reached through a plethora of different media channels. With the introduction of new social networks and media devices like iPads and Android smart phones, those channels increase every day.

But the reality is much more serious for marketers. Only a few years ago an IT professional was almost guaranteed to see your advertising if you placed it in a few key publications. Reach numbers were in the 80%+ range simply because an advert in a magazine had the potential to reach every single reader. In addition, it would continue to perform when that magazine was passed around the department. One ad reached hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of individuals.

Now if an advertisement runs on a website, typical share of voice numbers are minimal at best. Even when share of voice is high, with highly targeted media buys, the result is very few individual eyeballs and pretty much zero chance for passes on to others. Don’t believe me? Try and find your ad on a site. You either end up looking on just a few key site pages (home page, section page; so no depth to your reach) or you have to hit refresh a dozen or more times.

With this in mind what do we suggest for our clients? Firstly, don’t consider the web as the sole avenue to the audience. Recent studies of business professionals by Readex Research once again confirms the high reliance on print by the audience. With this in mind, find ways to carve out a slice of your budget to add depth to the media plan by including a mix of old and new media. Mix print at one end with web in the middle and a sprinkling of mobile at the other… mix it up a bit and be daring (by going old school!).

This multi-dimensional campaign strategy works. Our own campaign performance research proves that a business or an IT audience that sees a campaign across multiple media formats is more influenced by it, has better recall of it and will have a greater understanding of the message which it contains; and yes, eventually mobile content will continue to be a more viable delivery platform for your message. Just don’t think that the print workhorse is ready to be put out to pasture… because if you do you might just wish you had worked it that little bit harder while it was still there.

Dick Reed, CEO, Just Media, Inc.

A View from The Top: Past, Present, Future. ‘Live!’

To celebrate Just Media’s 15 years of successful business in California, we recently hosted a day of thought leadership and discussion: A View From The Top – Past, Present, Future; featuring key CEO’s, decision makers and industry leaders, who discussed their thoughts on the evolution of media and the ever changing and challenging world of IT marketing.

Video of the four sessions is now available through our technology partner BrightTALK™ and by clicking the following links you will be able to access the full sessions from the live event.

A VIEW FROM THE TOP – PAST, PRESENT, FUTURE
Senior executives from agencies, media organizations and clients came together for a stimulating morning of discussion focusing on the ever changing and challenging world of IT marketing.

Session 1: Looking Back And Looking Forward
Steve Weitzner, CEO, Ziff Davis Enterprise
Dick Reed, CEO, Just Media, Inc.

Dick and Steve discuss how the IT media publisher and agency have had to adapt and evolve over the years to address the changes in the media landscape and continue to best service both the IT audience and tech marketing client.

Session 2: Leveraging Brand Value
Josh Kahn, VP, Private Cloud Marketing, EMC
Marlene Williamson, VP, Global Marketing, Hitachi Global Storage Technologies
David Appelbaum, CMO, Act-On Software

Josh, Marlene and David discuss the challenges and opportunities that exist for tech companies to really leverage maximum value from their brand.

Session 3: Content Is King, But Distribution Is Key
Tony Uphoff, CEO, UBM TechWeb
Val-Pierre Genton, VP, Business Development, BrightTALK™

Tony and Val discuss the importance of generating great content and the issues and challenges with getting that content to the audience, given the ever more distributed communications channels.

Session 4: Social Media And The IT Professional
Matt Sweeney, CRO, Geeknet
Roger Warner, MD, Content & Motion
Sarah du Heaume, Founder, Just Media, Inc.

Sarah, Matt and Roger explore what it takes to build and manage successful social media environments specifically created for IT professionals.

You will need to register with BrightTALK™ in order to view the content.

We hope you enjoy the video discussion and find it stimulating and relevant. Please don’t hesitate to contact Just Media with any comments or questions or if you would like to learn more about Just Media and our services. As always, we welcome your feedback.

Analyzing 2010 Tech Marketing Spending Patterns

If, like me, you enjoy trying to get under the hood of the ad campaigns that we see from other technology marketers, then I am sure you will find this latest Just Media, Inc. report, 2010 Technology Advertising Spending, fascinating. In it we take a look at a sample of the ad spend numbers from 2010 for some of the industry’s leading advertisers. The numbers are enlightening in many ways – not least because we can see how different companies mix their media spend and get an insight into both general communications strategy and some specific tactics. They also provide an insight into the relation between revenues and advertising spend; always a useful comparison for internal discussions regarding budgets.

These numbers are obviously for the major vendors, but if you have an interest in your nearest competitor’s spending patterns then please let us know. We will be happy to see what we can research and offer our own insight into what they might be doing and why (and how you can best counter that with your own smart media investments).

If you do want to take advantage of this free opportunity, just email me with your company name and that of your three nearest competitors. If we find anything interesting in the current data you know we will be in touch immediately!

Dick Reed, CEO

iPad – already a valid media platform for B2B?

A couple of weeks ago the media team from Fortune Magazine came in to discuss the launch of their iPad app. During the presentation we played with the device and looked at existing apps from Wall Street Journal and Time Magazine. Both are excellent, very user friendly, highly interactive and offer a very pleasant user experience.

The view was universally held here that this could be another media platform game changer especially effecting print media and for B2B marketing in general. By next week every agency employee will be equipped with an iPad so we can get to know it intimately…but why the enthusiasm?

Well firstly the demographic of the adoption is very interesting. Just Media conducted a LinkedIn poll to assess the early adopter use of this device amongst the hard to reach “C Suite” audience. The results are extremely interesting and can be found here “Just Media iPad Poll”

In Summary 11% of C Suite executives claim to already own one and use it regularly while another 26% say they plan to get one. Pretty impressive stats.

Most interesting is that this skews more heavily towards C Suite executives in enterprise sized companies with adoption already at 27%.

Since other research we have seen to date point to this audience being the most avid consumers of print media and less inclined to consume content via the web, this adoption is even more startling. This perhaps illustrates the iPad’s most interesting feature as a media device – the fact it transcends both digital and print media formats….easily displaying content in a user friendly, portable and relaxed environment that simply is not the case with traditional internet sites on a laptop.

Is this playing out in reality – the answer is yes. Look at this week’s example. Wired has just launched an iPad app.  Apple announced they were naming it, “App of the Week,” on iTunes and, as of yesterday evening, WIRED has had 62,431 paid downloads.

 To provide some context to this number, within the first 5 days of being on-sale, the app has sold the equivalent of 76% of Wired’s average monthly newsstand sales. Additionally, based upon Apple’s disclosed sales of iPads, the app was downloaded and installed on roughly 3% of all iPad’s!

According to Mendelsson reaserch 20% of Wired’s print audience is C suite and the publication claims 72% hold a “Management” function it’s not hard to see a consistent pattern emerging here as regards the advantage of planning to use this device for B2B campaigns.

Finally let’s not loose sight of the advertising potential here. Fortune expect to mirror Time’s iPad ad format with up to ten pages of content and three imbedded video’s, all of which play in immaculate real time high quality versions. WSJ’s app shows some additional ad formats that are bold without being too intrusive and again offer nice interactivity. So far the ads are not distracting and the environments are uncluttered. In most cases the initial ad looks like the equivalent print ad which as we know has more impact than standard online banners.

So we have seen the future and it’s obvious that another media sea change is heading our way.

B2B research – brand verses demand gen

I was extremely interested to see some coverage of a research piece between Ziff Davis Enterprise, Forbes and B2B agency Stein Rogan and Partners. The article link on B2B magazine can be found here.

Firstly the findings that a majority of B2B marketers (64%) are giving equal weight to branding and demand gen is reassuring. Over the last 2 years we have found the tech market has shifted heavily towards lead generation, many times at the expense of more identifiable branding initiatives. This is also compounded by a shift to more digitally based, response focused media, often as we know at the expense of traditional media formats like print.

Now don’t get me wrong – it’s my personal opinion that lead gen and branding are entirely compatible, indeed the assets used to generate leads are often the “deliverable proof” of some higher brand promise (proving a technology leadership position, innovation in the field, improved servicing of a market segment, better customer service, etc).

However there’s a mind set question here. In many companies lead or demand gen is operated separately from corporate or brand communications. For marketers to realize the joint goals they set forth in the research, it’s going to be critical to see more integration of these two components.

As a second side note the views on mix of media used for branding is fascinating. OOH at 72% and social media at 69% ahead of broadcast and print 68% and 64% respectively bodes well for the OOH industry but really throws up another key point.

Social media is, by it’s nature unpredictable. My opinions here could in theory attract negative views from the market and may impact on my company brand. With social being a much more dynamic environment and less controllable, are marketers taking a huge risk by giving it such a huge role in brand development? It absolutely has a role to play. Giving it the right weight in the mix is where the questions lies.

These are interesting and highly dynamic times. B2B marketing departments and service companies as well as publishers are indeed set for exciting changes. The real winners will be those that get the media mix right and successfully integrate all the components. That change will need to start internally, with bigger broader campaign initiatives, real vision and use of appropriate metrics.

Soft media rates in 2009…I’m not so sure

Over the last few weeks I have heard numerous clients talk about an expectation of softening of the media rates into next year as the economy gets squeezed. But is this a reasonable assumption?

I would argue that it’s not and that unlike many previous recessionary periods which have seen media owners slash rates, we may not necessarily see the same trends this time, especially in our two prime media platforms -print and online…why you ask?

We lets start with print media.

In a previous life I used to be a magazine publisher, constantly watching the magazine balance sheet. It was generally tied to one key metric – page yields. High page yields invariably meant higher profit margins but also drove advertisers away when their perception of the magazine’s value was not matched by the rates they were offered. As a publisher you could chose to lower yields to chase higher page volumes, knowing that adding pages was relatively cheap and easy and could ultimately drive higher income and total profits even if margin was lowered. It also was critical when in a competitive market to gain market share as a show of strength.

Well in 2008 I think most publishers have established page yields that they feel they must maintain typically calculated to deliver a certain basic issue size. We all know it’s no longer about having a big issue size and they are happy to publish the minimum pages needed each week or month to service readers and a core of advertisers. Volume pressures have gone.

Also since publishers now see significantly less income generated from print media compared to other services like events, online and lead gen, magazines are much more easily closed without damaging the overall income model they have established. I know of even profitable magazines that have been closed because they no longer fitted a long term strategy, so advertisers should not expect any loyalty from publishers to their magazines if they themselves do not spend dollars on the ads.

So bottom line is I don’t think publishers will feel any inclination to give pages away just to stay afloat. Cutting issue size and closing magazines is more likely in most cases this time around especially where online extensions have been fully established.

Now online.

Well like many I expect rates to hold up. Demand is rising as dollars shift out of traditional media and a recession will only accelerate the trend to spending more on measurable media. It’s the safest option for marketing manager. Sites can still sell primary inventory at a decent margin knowing the spare inventory will be snapped up by ad networks desperate for a competitive edge especially in the B2B space. Sure consumer, high volume buys may see a squeeze with networks especially pushing to get onto more media buys, but it’s also the case that those media buys are much more ‘spray and prey’ than most in our space could ever be. Frankly for B2B most networks fall sadly flat.

So while there are certain to be a few deals out there it’s unlikely to be the shark frenzy we have seen in years gone by. Expect more consolidation and media closures than a rash of cheap ads. Expect your preferred online sites to be telling you they have sold out of all the good inventory rather than bucket shop deals. And expect your media agency to measure your expectations so that they can still buy the media they feel is effective rather than chase cheap deals.

As always it’s just my humble opinion.

Barmy Ballmer ???

So Microsoft guru Steve Ballmer has predicted the demise of media as we know it with some pretty bold statements in his recent interview with the Washington Post.

Steve feels that there will be no media that is not delivered via IP (the web) within a 8-15 year range. His particular point being the demise of print media but also revolutions in the delivery of TV as well. It’s an interesting opinion but is it realistic?

Whilst I agree that the web does offer significant opportunities for a revolution in content delivery especially a media like TV, to predict that all print will go is simply crazy. It’s a view I think he expresses for two reasons:

1/ Microsoft has a vested interested in trying to kill off non-web based media. They have invested massively in MSN and webmedia in general and have everything to gain by scaring the advertising market into shifting budget out of traditional media platforms.

2/ Steve’s views are probably skewed since the print media Microsoft has used – IT, business and newspapers, have been the hardest hit by changes in advertising spend patterns.

Also it’s simply not true that readers don’t want to read print media anymore.

Talk to any publisher and they will confirm that while there is increases in web traffic, especially covering items like news, sports and social chit chat, the decreases in print magazine circulations and issue sizes is more to do with simple business economics than the readers massively changing consumption habits. It’s declining ad spend that kills magazines and page counts not the readers (did you ever call a publication you liked and tell them to print less content?)

Look outside IT and newspaper segments and print appears to be doing pretty well. I recently reviewed magazines in the high household income, luxury lifestyle segment. There are magazines with circulations of less than 40,000 with folio sizes of over 250 pages. IT pubs rarely get above 60! Plenty of advertisers means plenty of pages.

Will IP based devices really replace print. Even today’s coolest devices are hardly great platforms for reading long in depth articles, especially when the content is complemented by high quality glossy photography. There’s also a generational aspect. Anyone over the age of 30 is still happy to read magazines. Even my younger staff sit down over lunch with trashy celeb magazines rather than continuing to stare a screen. It’s just human nature.

So whilst not ignoring some definite trends…mostly driven by advertisers and not readers, the future is not so black and white. Just like TV didn’t kill radio, a varied media landscape is here to stay.

As a parting shot, if Microsoft is so in tune with consumers desires, why are they now officially incorporating a “downgrade feature” into Vista . Hate to say I told you so….but I did.

IT Magazines – marketers it’s use them or lose them !

On 13th November I received an innocuous looking email from one of my good friends at IDG announcing the closure of a couple of magazines in Finland including the IT magazine Itviikko. The email went on to explain that the market now supported only one remaining print magazine targeting IT pro’s.

On the face of it this news is somewhat mundane..or is it.

Earlier in the year I was also told about some important changes in France. Groupe Tests, the leading IT publisher in the market was also consolidating it’s business. Several magazine closures would be taking place. The result- only one major magazine now servicing IT pro’s in France (IDG does have a small CIO title.

Now putting into context that France is the 7th biggest economy in the world then it starts to sink in just how significant the shift away from print advertising is impacting the choices available to marketers and agencies.

Should anyone care ?

Well at Just Media we have categorically proved to numerous clients the value of print as part of the marketing mix. Our research on campaign performance (which we label under the term ROMO or return on marketing objective) shows that print is significantly more effective at shifting awareness and brand attributes than any online campaign including rich media and video. Sadly we seem to be amongst the few pushing these facts into the market.

One thing is clear though…publishers are in the business of making money and if marketers fail to use print magazines then the option will simply not exists in the future.

Here in the US 2007 has seen some major closures including Info World, Intelligent Enterprise, Optimize and Network Computing. Most other magazines have adjusted circulations, reduced size or trimmed page counts. The changes are numerous and obvious…options are being compromised.

The worry is that no one will realize what they have lost until it’s too late.

Use them or lose them folks !!!